Bringing the resources together for a more efficient factory.
Tuesday 21/8/2018
Bookmark and Share
SEARCH NEWS
 
 
   
   
 
 
 
 


 Featured Links

 
 
For supplier companies who want to offer their customers comprehensive 24 hour online product ordering facilities, Netalogue b2b web catalogue and ordering plug-ins link instantly to any existing web page and are easily maintained via any standard product or component database.
 

  Smarter factories; safer working

22  May  2018

  In food produce environments and packhouses, the benefits of automation when it comes to workforce health and safety are uncontended. From eliminating arduous and repetitive tasks to working uninterrupted within inhospitable chilled settings, robots are most certainly the future. Case loading specialist Brillopak and industrial automation pioneer Omron explore how smart robots, hardware and software can be deployed to work collaboratively, safely and productively alongside human counterparts.

The picture frequently painted with Industry 4.0 is a “lights out factory” – a completely automated smart factory, requiring no human intervention. Yet, that’s not so much a journey forward as a complete step change, and for many it doesn’t represent a practical implementation of Industry 4.0 at all. Operators and maintenance staff are going to be key elements of any Industry 4.0 smart factory installation well into the future, and that in turn means that safety continues to be a vital consideration.

For packing operations commencing their Industry 4.0 journey, the issue is not so much one of removing people from the plant floor as implementing systems where people work in harmony and safely with the processes.

Brillopak director David Jahn explains: “Health & Safety should never be an afterthought. In order to work safer and achieve greater productivity, it is critical that factories take a strategic view of the legal and operational requirements at the outset. Automated packing, case loading and palletising machines should always be designed around safety rather than designed for a function and then bolting on a safety system later on in the manufacturing or testing process. This isn’t radically new or specifically applicable to Industry 4:0 - just good, safe, productive business practice. However, it requires a different mindset to machine building.”

The daily quest to optimise productivity and meet tight deadlines means that operators and maintenance personnel are almost forced to try to defeat safety systems. When the default reaction of a machine is an emergency stop triggered whenever an operator approaches, productivity can never be optimised. Indeed, such safety arrangements may almost be considered as confrontational from an operator’s point of view.

Putting into context a typical packing scenario, David says many ‘stop-start’ activities can treble production downtime and eat into OEE. If the restart process from a controlled or emergency stop is not logical, simple and fast, this too encourages reckless behaviour among machine operatives, who typically bypass safety measures to get a machine up and running again. “Short line stops are often viewed as the bane of packing line operations,” notes David. To overcome situations like this, Brillopak’s P160 robotic case packer applies a combination of technology, variable speed drives and mechanics that make restarts less complex. As a result, personnel are less inclined to take short cuts. 

Suggesting that safety systems in the future could be all but invisible to operators and maintenance personnel, Dan Rossek from Omron concurs saying: “People in the future will have no reason to try to defeat the safety technologies because they are no longer slowing them down.”

Don’t let your safety guard down

As plant floor space becomes more valuable and more machinery is squeezed in, fixed guarding is often considered a design restriction. Yet without it, the chances that operators and maintenance personnel might encroach into a danger zone increase.

There are different ways to approach this dilemma suggests David. “Again, you are looking at the whole picture. This can include providing quick accessibility to clear a bottleneck or carry out maintenance, selecting the most efficient type of guard - ranging from locked, hinged or heavy weighted - and ensuring your workforce receives regular training. H&S execs we encounter are well informed and we always try to utilise their expertise at the start of each machine build to reach the optimal and safest solution.

“Having to physically remove guards and reinsert them can be much more time consuming than locked panels,” says David. Ten minutes of machine downtime removing panels could potentially equate to 1,200 fewer units being packed, he asserts. Brillopak also factors ergonomics into machine layout, including how maintenance engineers can access key areas comfortably, avoiding overstretching and bending into or around tight corners.

Another approach to physical or static guarding is to deploy force sensing technology. Here, the robot slows down when operators approach, only stopping when a set threshold is passed, which significantly improves productivity.

Dan explains how this type of software can be applied. “Zones of safety can be defined with scanners, and software functions such as safe speed 1 (SS1) or safe torque off (STO) can be implemented in variable speed drives. Different modes of operation can be defined depending on whether it is operators or maintenance staff who are interacting with the machine, each with their own requirements, and limiting speed and/or functionality accordingly.”

Collaboration between hardware and software

The term ‘integrated safety’ has become a somewhat overused and misapplied phrase in recent years, with many considering it to be simply the ability for the safety network to exchange data with the standard control network. “Truly integrated safety fully embeds the safety aspect as part of the wider control system: safety controllers and safety I/O can be freely distributed around the standard I/O, with a single environment for configuration, programming and maintenance,” says Dan.

Recognising the importance of safety within the truly collaborative machine, Omron has fully embedded safety within its Sysmac automation platform, making it easier for machine builders like Brillopak to consider safety functionality from the outset rather than as a costly and inflexible bolt-on at the end of the design process.

A full suite of tested, proven and certified safety function blocks within the password protected Sysmac Studio development environment eliminate the cost and risk of a software free-for-all, and make it easy for designers to implement safety functions as required. The result - safety is no longer a ‘road block’ within the design process.

Reaffirming the importance of having access to flexible solutions that support factory productivity in collaboration with workforce safety, David explains how Brillopak robotic packing systems apply integrated safety to detect, remove and hold products in a specific location. “We build a specific collection point into the system. When the machine identifies an issue, it simply places this product in the holding area until an operative can remove it in a safe and controlled manner. Operatives are alerted to the issue by the HMI. The real productivity benefit is the packing line keeps on running until the product can be removed when it’s mutually convenient.”

Brillopak also utilises variable speed drives to mange forces and provide enhanced control during a pick and pack process. “Accurate placement of products into crates depends upon momentum and the control of movement by a robotic arm, which is critical to product presentation,” explains David.

As manufacturing and packing requirements evolve, so too do productivity and safety challenges. The ability to react swiftly and easily to legislative changes and take advantage of new technologies will be a critical market of success in tomorrow’s smart factories. “Taking a purely hardware based response to safety has physical and conceptual limitations,” suggests Dan. “Fixed and inflexible hardware systems can end up working against the legislation, while properly integrated safety technologies allow designers to more easily react to changes.”

Collaborative safety lays down an important marker on the path to Industry 4.0. Yet, it requires a change of mindset to machine design. For Brillopak, it defines a new era where automated machines and operators work in harmony, and where safety design has a genuinely positive impact on productivity. Dan agrees concluding that taking a fully integrated approach to safety is not a hindrance to innovation at all. “The automation platform is what makes it all possible.”

For more information, please contact:

David Yahn
Brillopak Ltd
9 Archers Park
Branbridges Road
East Peckham
Tonbridge
Kent
TN12 5HP
Tel:  +44 (0)1622 872907
Fax:  +44 (0)1622 872979
Email: info@brillopak.co.uk
Web:  www.brillopak.co.uk
   
  FactoryEquipment.com are not responsible for the content of submitted or externally produced articles and images.
Click here to email FactoryEquipment.com about any errors or omissions contained within this article.
   

 


Bookmark and Share
FactoryEquipment.Com
Reg. no 3733110  Email Editor   Email Webmaster
(c) Copyright 2005-2018 FactoryEquipment.com